The Theory of the End of Art by Danto

Philosophy and Culture 37 (5):173-189 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Danto that the development of art history has ended in 1964, because of the emergence of Warhol's "Bu Ruiluo box." It is just daily things, we can not distinguish between this work and the real Burui Luo box. But it does not mean the end of art can not have art, does not mean that art is no longer valuable. It just means that the possibility of the concept of art has been exhausted, the arts can no longer be in style in a breakthrough, art history can not be further development. Danto believes that art after the end of two consequences. One is in the art after the end of the explicit nature from non-essential to the Arts under the definition, the other is pluralism. Danto influenced by Hegel's view of history, with the "art of self-awareness" to explain the development of the arts, and the development of modern art is to continuously search for the essence of art, the end of art is that art can not further understanding of their own, must be to complete this task to philosophy. Although I generally agree with Danto's interpretation of art history, but I think the end of modernist art does not mean the end of art. Danto thinks that the development of art history was over in 1964, because Andy Warhol's "Brillo Box" appeared. We can no longer make a distinction between this work of art and the real Brillo Box, which is just a commonplace object. However, the end of art does not mean we cannot make art anymore, nor does it mean that art has lost its value. It just means the concept of art is exhausted. No new style of art can emerge. There is no direction for art history to go on. Danto told us that there are two consequences of the end of art. One is we can find the essence of art and define art in terms of non-manifest properties. The other is pluralism. Danto was influenced by Hegel's view of art history , he used "self understanding of art" to interpret the development of art, and he thought that the development of modernist art is to find out the essence of art. The end of art means that art can no longer understands itself, it should pass this mission to philosophy. In general, I agree with that the interpretation of art history given by Danto, but I think the end of modernism does not necessarily mean the end of art

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,347

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-07

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references