From Hart to Dworkin via Brandom: indeterminancy, interpretation, and objectivity

In Gonzalo Villa Rosas & Jorge Luis Fabra-Zamora (eds.), Objectivity in jurisprudence, legal interpretation and practical reasoning. Northampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar Publishing (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,571

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Brandom on Norms and Objectivity.Leonardo Marchettoni - 2018 - Critical Horizons 19 (3):215-232.
Levine on Brandom’s Account of Objectivity.Byeong D. Lee - 2022 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 30 (1):35-55.
Die Hart-Dworkin-Debatte als Grundlagenkontroverse der angloamerikanischen Rechtsphilosophie.Johannes Saurer - 2012 - Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie 98 (2):214-232.
The concept of law.Hla Hart - 1961 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Perspectivas iusfilosóficas contemporáneas: Ross, Hart, Bobbio, Dworkin, Villey.Rodolfo Luis Vigo - 1991
Jurisprudential Oaks from Mythical Acorns: The Hart-Dworkin Debate Revisited.Andrew Boon Leong Phang - 1990 - Ratio Juris 3 (3):385-398.
Brandom and the Pragmatist Quest for Semantic Objectivity.Jaakko Reinikainen - 2021 - Acta Philosophica Fennica 97:55-78.
Legal reasoning and legal theory.Neil MacCormick (ed.) - 1978 - New York: Oxford University Press.
La importancia de la discusión metodológica entre Dworkin y el positivismo.Facundo García Valverde - 2007 - Revista Latinoamericana de Filosofia 33 (1):25-53.
Objectivity in Law.Nicos Stavropoulos - 1996 - Oxford University Press UK.
Objectivity in Law.Nicos Stavropoulos - 2000 - Mind 109 (435):650-653.
Rules, Principles, Algorithms and the Description of Legal Systems.Stephen Utz - 1992 - Ratio Juris 5 (1):23-45.
The History and Foundations of Criticism of H.L.A. Hart’s Legal Positivism in R. Dworkin’s Philosophy of Law.Sofya V. Koval - 2019 - Russian Journal of Philosophical Sciences 62 (7):124-142.
Incorporationism, Conventionality, and the Practical Difference Thesis.Jules L. Coleman - 1998 - Legal Theory 4 (4):381-425.
Brandom’s solution to the objectivity problem.Peter Grönert - 2005 - Pragmatics and Cognition 13 (1):161-176.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-12-24

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references