David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
This article analyses the rhetorical legitimation strategy of post-Soviet Uzbekistan under Islam Karimov as an authoritarian state. I show that the most important mode of legitimation in this case is neither the consequentialist appeal to stability, order or welfare, nor a direct appeal to guardianship, i.e., special knowledge. Rather, Karimov and his court intellectuals seek to advance a conception of 'ideology' as the comprehensive pre-political consensus of the political community. Their concept of 'ideology' is used to advance a political logic whereby the nature of the political community, the purpose of the state, the unifying political telos and the present regime are fused into a single entity. This ontological fusion is presented as a hegemonic reality and occurs at the pre-political level, resulting in the vanishingly small space left over for politics that characterizes authoritarian systems. I then suggest that such analysis of the hegemonic strategy of authoritarian regimes, and above all the teleological conception of politics it advances, is a superior approach to authoritarian legitimation than the search for explicit 'consequentualist' versus 'principled' arguments.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library||
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Gábor Kovács (1999). Can Power Be Humanized? The Notions of Elite and Legitimation in István Bibó's Political Philosophy. Studies in East European Thought 51 (4):307-327.
Ian Adams (1989). The Logic of Political Belief: A Philosophical Analysis of Ideology. Barnes & Noble Books.
William A. Edmundson (2010). Political Authority, Moral Powers and the Intrinsic Value of Obedience. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 30 (1):179-191.
Tom Casier (1999). The Shattered Horizon How Ideology Mattered to Soviet Politics. Studies in East European Thought 51 (1):35-59.
Gayil Talshir, Mathew Humphrey & Michael Freeden (eds.) (2006). Taking Ideology Seriously: 21st Century Reconfigurations. Routledge.
Gayil Talshir (2005). The Phoenix of Ideology. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 8 (2):107-124.
Olga Voronina (1993). Soviet Patriarchy: Past and Present. Hypatia 8 (4):97 - 112.
Francis Remedios (2003). Fuller and Rouse on the Legitimation of Scientific Knowledge. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 33 (4):444-463.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads21 ( #78,323 of 1,096,714 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #162,598 of 1,096,714 )
How can I increase my downloads?