Argumentation, values, and ethics

Sorites 8:24-32 (1997)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Moral concepts are argumentative values with claims to universal acceptance. they exprees beliefs that are formed in dialogical exchange. The paper defines conditions of acceptability of this kind of beliefs and its limitations

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,323

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Intrinsic Versus Instrumental Values of Argumentation: The Rhetorical Dimension of Argumentation. [REVIEW]Lilian Bermejo-Luque - 2010 - Argumentation 24 (4):453-474.
Critical Thinking in Moral Argumentation Contexts: A Virtue Ethical Approach.Michelle Ciurria - 2012 - Informal Logic 32 (2):242-258.
Existential Beliefs and Values.Niranjan Narasimhan, Kumar Bhaskar & Srinivas Prakhya - 2010 - Journal of Business Ethics 96 (3):369 - 382.
Gandhi, Tagore and a New Ethics of Argumentation.Ananta Kumar Giri - 2001 - Journal of Human Values 7 (1):43-63.
Is Common Ground a Word or Just a Sound?Paola Cantù - 2007 - In H. V. Hanson (ed.), Proceedings of the International Conference: Dissensus & The Search for Common Ground. Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation. pp. 1--9.
Agreeing to Differ: Modelling Persuasive Dialogue Between Parties With Different Values.Chris Reed - 2002 - Informal Logic 22 (3).
Coalescent argumentation.Michael A. Gilbert - 1995 - Argumentation 9 (5):837-852.
Norms for values in scientific belief acceptance.Heather Douglas - unknown
Temporal, numerical and meta-level dynamics in argumentation networks.H. Barringer, D. M. Gabbay & J. Woods - 2012 - Argument and Computation 3 (2-3):143 - 202.
Complex Argumentation in a Critical Discussion.A. F. Snoeck Henkemans - 2003 - Argumentation 17 (4):405-419.
Why I don't believe in moral values: a comment on Culyer.H. V. McLachlan - 2003 - Journal of Medical Ethics 29 (4):242-242.
Persuasive Definitions: Values, Meanings and Implicit Disagreements.Fabrizio Macagno & Douglas Walton - 2008 - Informal Logic 28 (3):203-228.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-01-22

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references