Abstract

Objektivni teoretski pristop, ki je usmerjen k sistematizaciji in klasifikaciji pogosto ne upošteva vrednosti glasbene vsebine. Transcendentalne zavesti torej ne dojema kot forme subjektivnosti, kot abstrakcijo in alineacijo od sveta polifone kompozicije, kakor tudi transcendentalne subjektivnosti nasploh, kar povzroča dezintegracijo vse vednosti in umanjkanje skupnega jedra filozofije Nove glasbe in njenih teoretskih osnov. Stalna tenzija ne karakterizira le razmerja med znanstvenim in praktičnim svetom; znanost ni edini prostor kjer je transcendenca skrita, marveč se tudi primerja, da subjektivnost kot transcendentalna asumpcija ostaja skrita ali nezadostno “razgrnjena” tudi v praksi. To pomeni, da je potreba za to samorazgrnitev transcendence osnovni predpogoj za premostitev krize sveta znanosti in umetnosti v dvajsetem stoletju. Le kolikor so izvršene naloge transcendentalne fenomenologije je mogoče obnoviti njihove prekinjene vezi s skupnim jedrom kot izvirom znanstvenega in praktičnega razumevanja ‘stvari samih’.The objective theoretical approach directed towards systematization or classification often neglects the values of musical content. It also fails to perceive transcendental consciousness as a form of subjectivity, as abstraction and alienation from the world of polyphonic composition and from transcendental subjectivity generally, thus causing a disintegration off all knowledge, a disappearance of common core of the philosophy of New Music and of its theoretical foundations. Constant tension best characterizes not only the relation between the world of science and the world of practice, and science is not the only place where transcendence is hidden, but it is also the case that subjectivity, as a transcendental assumption, remains hidden or insufficiently ‘revealed’ even in practice, which means that the need for this self revelation of transcendence is the basic pre-condition for the twentieth-century crisis of the word of science an art to be overcome. Only when the tasks of transcendental phenomenology are carried out will it be possible to renew their broken bonds with the common core as the source of scientific and practical understanding of ‘things themselves’