Artificial Intelligence for the Internal Democracy of Political Parties

Abstract

The article argues that AI can enhance the measurement and implementation of democratic processes within political parties, known as Intra-Party Democracy (IPD). It identifies the limitations of traditional methods for measuring IPD, which often rely on formal parameters, self-reported data, and tools like surveys. Such limitations lead to the collection of partial data, rare updates, and significant demands on resources. To address these issues, the article suggests that specific data management and Machine Learning (ML) techniques, such as natural language processing and sentiment analysis, can improve the measurement (ML about) and practice (ML for) of IPD. The article concludes by considering some of the principal risks of ML for IPD, including concerns over data privacy, the potential for manipulation, and the dangers of overreliance on technology.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Ethical Machines?Ariela Tubert - 2018 - Seattle University Law Review 41 (4).
Artificial Intelligence and Wittgenstein.Gerard Casey - 1988 - Philosophical Studies (Dublin) 32:156-175.
Classification: Absolutism vs Relativism.Darren Weist - 2017 - Dissertation, University of Michigan - Flint

Analytics

Added to PP
2024-04-02

Downloads
199 (#99,214)

6 months
199 (#14,018)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Claudio Novelli
University of Bologna
Luciano Floridi
Yale University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations