Managing knowledge, governing society: social theory, research policy and environmental transition

New York, NY: Routledge (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Since the 1980s, two different paradigms have reshaped industrial societies: the Neoliberal paradigm and a Research and Innovation paradigm. Both have been conceptualized and translated into strong policies with massive economic and social consequences. They provide divergent responses to the environmental transition. The Neoliberal paradigm is based on economic models and geopolitical solutions. The Research and Innovation paradigm's goal is to manage knowledge differently in order to reorient the evolution of society. Since the mid-1990s, a version of the Research and Innovation paradigm has led to the design of large-scale research and innovation policies. This book examines how these policies have evolved and how they can be extended and reformed to respond to present and future environmental constraints. It studies the transformation of the conception, organization and role of science and technology in the evolution of industrial societies and explores the future of these developments. The book offers three unique lines of enquiry. The first is to focus not specifically on economics, sociology, political science or history, but on knowledge creation from an institutional and reflexive point of view. The second is to establish a convergence between the British school of science and technology studies and the research trends opened by the work of Michel Foucault. Both introduced trans-disciplinary and policy-oriented research associating case studies, long-term perspectives and theory. The third is to consider climate change as the overwhelming challenge of our time. The book is an insightful guide for students, scholars and researchers across the humanities and social sciences, including philosophy, political science, law, economics, business and media.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,503

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Policing knowledge: Disembodied policy for embodied knowledge.Joseph Rouse - 1991 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 34 (3-4):353 – 364.
Science Policy: A Tool for Coping with Challenges.Adolf Filáček - 2009 - Teorie Vědy / Theory of Science 31 (3-4):9-36.
Science, social theory and public knowledge.Alan Irwin - 2003 - Philadelphia: Open University Press. Edited by Mike Michael.
Social science and social engineering.Philip M. Hauser - 1949 - Philosophy of Science 16 (3):209-218.
The Role of Humanities Policy in Public Science.Robert Frodeman - 2005 - Environmental Philosophy 2 (1):5-13.
A Comparative Study Of Harmonious Society Theories In A Social Policy Perspective.Chack-kie Wong & Hua-min Peng - 2009 - Nankai University (Philosophy and Social Sciences) 1:45-51.
Trading zones as a subject-matter of social philosophy of science.Ilya Kasavin - 2017 - Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 51 (1):8-17.
social epistemology.K. Brad Wray - 2013 - In Stathis Psillos & Martin Curd (eds.), The Routledge Companion to Philosophy of Science. Routledge.
Governance: The art of governing after governmentality.Henrik Enroth - 2014 - European Journal of Social Theory 17 (1):60-76.
The social function of social science.Duncan MacRae - 1976 - New Haven: Yale University Press.
Boundaries between Science and Policy.Heather Douglas - 2005 - Environmental Philosophy 2 (1):14-29.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-11-19

Downloads
10 (#1,184,994)

6 months
6 (#508,473)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references