The Teubner Caesar C. Iuli Caesaris Commentarii. Edidit Alfredus Klotz. Vol. II. Commentarii Belli Civilis. Editio altera. Pp. xxii+170. Leipzig: Teubner, 1950. Cloth and boards, $2.35
The Classical Review 2 (02):85-86 (1952)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | No categories specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,705 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesJ. H. Simon (1954). The Teubner Caesar C. Iuli Caesaris Commentarii. Edidit Alfredus Klotz. Vol. I. Commentarii Belli Gallici. Editio Quarta. Pp. Xlviii+260. Leipzig: Teubner, 1952. Cloth and Boards, DM. 8.50. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 4 (3-4):262-264.
H. Stewart (1929). A New Text of the Gallic War C. Iuli Caesaris Commentarii. Edidit Alfredus Klotz. Vol. I. Commentarii Belli Gallici. Editio Maior, Editio Altera. Pp. Xl + 289; 1 Map. Leipzig: Teubner, 1927. Paper, M. 7.20; Cloth, M. 9. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 43 (04):144-145.
H. Stewart (1929). Corpus Caesarianum C. Iuli Caesaris Commentarii. Edidit Alfredus Klotz. Vol. III. Commentarii Belli Alexandrini, Belli Africi, Belli Hispaniensis. Accedunt C.Iuli Caesaris Et A. Hirtii Fragmenta. Pp. Xvi + 248, 1 Plan. Leipzig: Teubner, 1927. Paper, M. 5.60; Cloth, M. 6.80. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 43 (01):29-31.
A. G. Peskett (1926). C. Iulius Caesar: Comtnentarii Belli Civilis. A. Klotz. Pp. 139. Editio Minor. Lipsiae in Aedibus B. G. Teubner, 1925. The Classical Review 40 (02):89-.
A. G. Peskett (1926). Caesar's Civil War C. Iulius Caesar: De Bella Civili. Edidit A. Klotz. Editio Maior. Pp. Xii + 184. Leipzig: Teubner, 1926. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 40 (05):167-168.
J. G. F. Powell (1989). W. Hering: C. Iulii Caesaris Commentarii Rerum Gestarum, Vol. I: Bellum Gallicum. (Bibl. Teubneriana.) Pp. Xx + 179. Leipzig: Teubner, 1987. 39 M. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 39 (02):392-393.
A. Wasserstein (1963). Sextus Empiricus. Vol. Iii: Adversus Mathematicos, I–Vi. Iterum Edidit J. Mau. Pp. Xiv + 177. Vol. Iv: Indices. Gollegit K. Janáček. Editio Altera Auctior. Pp. Vii + 262. Leipzig: Teubner, 1962. Cloth, DM. 8.50, 20. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 13 (02):223-.
H. Nettleship (1888). Zervii Grammatici Qni Feruntur in Vergilii Carmina Commentarii. Recensuerunt Georglus Thilo Et Hermannus Hagen. Vol. III. Fase. I. In Bucolica Et Georgica Commentarii. Leipzig, Teubner. 1887. 10 Mk. 40. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 2 (03):82-.
T. E. Wright (1951). A New Teubner Text of Horace Q. Horati Flacci Opera Iterum Recognouit Fridericus Klingner. (Bibl. Scr. Gr. Et Rom. Teubneriana.) Pp. Xxii + 378. Leipzig: Teubner, 1950. Cloth and Boards, $3.75. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 1 (3-4):180-181.
F. H. Sandbach (1954). The Teubner Moralia Plutarchi Moralia. Vol. VI, Fasc. Ii. Edidit M. Pohlenz. Pp. Xii+224. Leipzig: Teubner, 1952. Cloth and Boards, DM. 9. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 4 (3-4):249-251.
A. G. Peskett (1899). Holder's Bellum Civile C. Ivli Caesaris Belli Civilis, Libri Iii.; Recensuit Alfred Holder. Leipzig, Teubner, 1898. The Classical Review 13 (01):59-60.
E. C. Marchant (1935). Xenophontis Commentarii. Recensuit K. Hude. Editio Maior. Pp. Vi + 195. Leipzig: Teubner, 1934. Paper, RM. 3.80 (Bound, 4.80). [REVIEW] The Classical Review 49 (02):90-.
N. H. (1889). Iuli Frontini Strategematon Libri Quattuor Edidit Gottholdus Gundermann. Leipzig, Teubner, 1888. 1 Mk. 50.Iuli Valeri Res Gestae Alexandri Macedonis. Collatio Alexandri Cum Dindimo: Epistola Alexandri Ad Aristotelem. Recensuit Bernardus Kuebler; Leipzig, Teubner, 1888. 4 Mk. 80. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 3 (07):311-.
Analytics
Monthly downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
|
Added to index2011-12-06Total downloads2 ( #232,628 of 549,198 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,397 of 549,198 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
