Breaking Up is Hard to Do

Philosophy in the Contemporary World 14 (2):60-73 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper begins by distinguishing between two levels at which ethics has been applied in the past half century. Typically, ethics gets applied at the level of public debate and policy. Much less often, applied ethics centers on the personal level. As a literature search reveals, this is true of recent philosophic discussions of divorce. This paper seeks to begin an alternative philosophic discussion of divorce and separation by considering it at a personal level. I begin this discussion by analyzing two different conceptions of love-eros and agape-and suggest a synthesis of the two. The conception of love that I endorse suggests that the value of the parties in a loving relationship is constructed within the relationship itself. It is this feature of love that helps to explain why so many feel sueh a sense of worthlessness when experiencing a divorce or separation. Namely, that much of the positive value they had within their relationship has little or no value outside the context of that relationship.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,410

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Breaking Up is Hard to Do.Scott Stewart - 2007 - Philosophy in the Contemporary World 14 (2):60-73.
Is Divorce Promise-Breaking?Elizabeth Brake - 2011 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 14 (1):23-39.
What is the point of love?Carolyn Price - 2012 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 20 (2):217-237.
Love.Bennett W. Helm - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Loving nature: Eros or agape?Susan P. Bratton - 1992 - Environmental Ethics 14 (1):3-25.
Lost and Found: Selfhood and Subjectivity in Love.Camilla Kronqvist - 2012 - Philosophical Investigations 35 (3-4):205-223.
On 'Love at First Sight'.Christian Maurer - 2014 - In Christian Maurer, Tony Milligan & Kamila Pacovská (eds.), Love and Its Objects: What Can We Care For? Palgrave-Macmillan. pp. 160-174.
The model of love: a study in philosophical theology.Vincent Brümmer - 1993 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
Loving People for Who They Are (Even When They Don't Love You Back).Sara Protasi - 2016 - European Journal of Philosophy 24 (1):214-234.
The Unity of Eros and Agape.Kyle Hubbard - 2011 - Essays in Philosophy 12 (1):130-146.
Love, Christian and Diverse: A Response to Colin Grant.Edward Collins Vacek - 1996 - Journal of Religious Ethics 24 (1):29-34.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-02-15

Downloads
7 (#1,393,386)

6 months
2 (#1,206,230)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references