Predatory publishing and beall’s list: Lessons for the countries adapting novel research evaluation criteria

Science and Education: Academic Journal of Ushynsky University 23 (8):39-43 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,197

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Unethical Practices in Scholarly, Open-Access Publishing.Jeffrey Beall - 2013 - Journal of Information Ethics 22 (1):11-20.
End of 2016: Can We Save Research from Predators in 2017?Aamir Raoof Memon - 2018 - Science and Engineering Ethics 24 (4):1339-1345.
Criteria and evaluation of cognitive theories.Petros A. M. Gelepithis - 2003 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (5):607-609.
Fake Journals: Not Always Valid Ways to Distinguish Them.Khaled Moustafa - 2015 - Science and Engineering Ethics 21 (5):1391-1392.
Relevance, Acceptability, and Sufficiency Today.J. Blair - 2007 - Anthropology and Philosophy 8 (1-2):33-48.
Establishing a research and evaluation capability for the joint medical education and training campus.Sheila Nataraj Kirby - 2011 - Santa Monica, CA: RAND Center for Military Policy Research. Edited by Julie A. Marsh & Harry Thie.
Whither Thou Goest, Philosophy of Education ….Matthew J. Hayden - 2014 - Studies in Philosophy and Education 33 (6):667-672.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-02-08

Downloads
22 (#712,478)

6 months
7 (#438,648)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references