The fundamental argument for same-sex marriage

Journal of Political Philosophy 7 (3):225–242 (1999)
This paper offers an argument in favour of the conclusion that it is seriously unjust to exclude same-sex couples from the institution of civil marriage. The argument is based on an interpretation of what the institution of marriage essentially is, and of its essential rationale; the crucial claim is that although marriage is a legal institution, it is also a social institution, involving a "social meaning" -- a body of common knowledge and expectations about marriage that is generally shared throughout society.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/1467-9760.00075
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 23,316
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
David Archard (2012). The Future of the Family. Ethics and Social Welfare 6 (2):132-142.
Elizabeth Brake (2007). Marriage, Morality, and Institutional Value. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 10 (3):243 - 254.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

354 ( #6,545 of 1,926,197 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

7 ( #131,512 of 1,926,197 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.