Gary, I am too far from associating "pseudo-philosophers" with "loving wisdom", I am afraid I am misunderstood here.

I just mean that if one suggests that there are two kinds of Philosophy, and the first of them is the genuine one, practiced by professional, scholarly philosophers, whose works are welcomed in reviewed publications, so nothing remains but to allow that those practicing the second one, whose works are unwelcomed in those publications, are themselves "pseudo-philosophers", in fact wasting time on Philosophy just for the sake of their "love of wisdom".

So that is not my assertion as you claim, but the consequences in case of allowing that there are two kinds of Philosophy.