Abstract

ABSTRACTHow do researchers explain religion’s durability in Costa Rica and intense secularization in Uruguay in spite of parallel historical developments? This article seeks to explain why current theories of secularization and religious stability are inadequate to explain this outcome due to the limits of positivistic assumptions and methodological individualism. Archer’s morphogenetic approach provides a better model because it avoids conflation by emphasizing emergence and analytic dualism between individual action and social context over time. Causation is explained by analysing historically contingent outcomes which allow for a synthesis of both abstract properties and how conjunctive events are related thus necessitating the role of human agency as opposed to macro-social forces.