Why Physics Does Not Inform the Human Condition, But Its Boundaries Do

Foundations of Science:1-13 (forthcoming)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The science of physics has been extremely successful over the last four centuries, mainly for one reason: It does everything it can to disregard anything that has to do with non-physical parts of reality. Although the human body is a physical body, large parts of what distinguishes human beings, sometimes briefly called the human condition, does not belong to the physical domain. This implies that physics (and other sciences of the material universe) offers nothing more than self-imposed helplessness when it comes to questions as to what it means to be human. Yet it is possible to scrutinize the way in which physics (and other sciences) is delineated from the rest of reality: to reconsider its boundaries as they were set about four centuries ago. In other words, it is possible to look for features within the physical that are related to something outside the physical which physics itself ignores. The key concept to do so is proposed to be meaning, in its two variants of reference and sense. Meaning provides a viable perspective to illuminate the deep structure of reality as it extends beyond physics and across its boundaries.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,150

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Is physics an universal science?Grzegorz Białkowski - 1998 - Foundations of Science 3 (1):9-21.
Quantum mechanics and realism.Peter Kosso - 2000 - Foundations of Science 5 (1):47-60.
Mathematical Arguments in Context.Jean Bendegem & Bart Kerkhove - 2009 - Foundations of Science 14 (1-2):45-57.
On the Association for Foundations of Science, Language and Cognition, AFOS.[author unknown] - 2004 - Foundations of Science 2 (1):197-198.
Towards a theory of mathematical argument.Ian J. Dove - 2013 - In Andrew Aberdein & Ian J. Dove (eds.), Foundations of Science. Springer. pp. 291--308.
Call for Projects of Topic Issues.[author unknown] - 2004 - Foundations of Science 2 (2):400-400.
Call for Proposals for Special Issues.[author unknown] - 1999 - Foundations of Science 3 (2):467-467.
First Summer School for Theory of Knowledge.[author unknown] - 2004 - Foundations of Science 2 (1):195-195.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-04-07

Downloads
7 (#1,390,290)

6 months
2 (#1,203,746)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Facing up to the problem of consciousness.David Chalmers - 1995 - Journal of Consciousness Studies 2 (3):200-19.
What is it like to be a bat?Thomas Nagel - 1974 - Philosophical Review 83 (October):435-50.
Uber Sinn und Bedeutung.Gottlob Frege - 1892 - Zeitschrift für Philosophie Und Philosophische Kritik 100 (1):25-50.
Frege.Michael Dummett - 1975 - Teorema: International Journal of Philosophy 5 (2):149-188.
Fields of Sense: A New Realist Ontology.Markus Gabriel - 2015 - Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

View all 9 references / Add more references