Russian Studies in Philosophy 50 (4):56-72 (2012)
The author analyzes proof and argumentation as a form of appeal to a scientific community with deep ethical meaning. He presents proof primarily as an effort to persuade a scientific community rather than a search for true knowledge, as an instrument by which responsibility is taken for the correctness of the thesis being proved, which usually originates in a sudden flash of insight
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Proofs and Rebuttals: Applying Stephen Toulmin's Layout of Arguments to Mathematical Proof.Andrew Aberdein - 2006 - In Marta Bílková & Ondřej Tomala (eds.), The Logica Yearbook 2005. Filosofia. pp. 11-23.
The Dialectical Tier of Mathematical Proof.Andrew Aberdein - 2011 - In Frank Zenker (ed.), Argumentation: Cognition & Community. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference of the Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation (OSSA), May 18--21, 2011. OSSA.
Erhard Weigel's Contributions to the Formation of Symbolic Logic.Maarten Bullynck - 2013 - History and Philosophy of Logic 34 (1):25-34.
The Nature of Mathematical Objects.Øystein Linnebo - 2008 - In Bonnie Gold & Roger Simons (eds.), Proof and Other Dilemmas: Mathematics and Philosophy. Mathematical Association of America. pp. 205--219.
Reductive Logic and Proof-Search: Proof Theory, Semantics, and Control.David J. Pym - 2004 - Oxford University Press.
Evolution of Mathematical Proof.Marian Mrozek & Jacek Urbaniec - 1997 - Foundations of Science 2 (1):77-85.
The Informal Logic of Mathematical Proof.Andrew Aberdein - 2006 - In Reuben Hersh (ed.), 18 Unconventional Essays About the Nature of Mathematics. Springer Verlag. pp. 56-70.
Added to index2012-07-22
Total downloads9 ( #455,047 of 2,153,478 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #399,083 of 2,153,478 )
How can I increase my downloads?