Consent, Sex, and the Prenatal Rapist: A Brief Reply to McDonaghs's Suggested Revision of Roe v. Wade

Journal of Libertarian Studies 4:1-16 (1980)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,990

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Consent, sex, and the prenatal rapist.Suggested Revision - 2003 - Journal of Libertarian Studies 17 (3):1œ16.
The End of Roe v. Wade.Mary Ziegler - 2022 - American Journal of Bioethics 22 (8):16-21.
The Invisible Prenatal Human Being.Jackson Milton - 2022 - American Journal of Bioethics 22 (8):82-84.
Casey and the Resuscitation of Roe v. Wade.John A. Robertson - 1992 - Hastings Center Report 22 (5):24-28.
The Fate of Roe v. Wade.Sarah Gill - 1992 - Hastings Center Report 22 (5):24-24.
A Decision-Theoretic Reconstruction of Roe V. Wade.Ted Lockhart - 1991 - Public Affairs Quarterly 5 (3):243-258.
Is There Life after Roe v. Wade?Mary B. Mahowald - 1989 - Hastings Center Report 19 (4):22.
At Law: Roe v. Wade Reaffirmed, Again.George J. Annas - 1986 - Hastings Center Report 16 (5):26.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-07

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references