Korsgaard and Non-Sentient Life

Between the Species 17 (1) (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Christine Korsgaard argues for the moral status of animals and our obligations to them. She grounds this obligation on the notion that we share a common identity, our animal nature, with them and that animal pain represents a public reason that binds us; nevertheless, her distinctive attempt to enlist Kantian arguments to account for our obligations to animals has a startling implication that she fails to adequately consider: that we have direct duties to plants as well

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,774

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-07-09

Downloads
29 (#135,560)

6 months
5 (#1,552,255)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Gregory Bock
University of Texas At Tyler

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The sources of normativity.Christine M. Korsgaard - 1996 - New York: Cambridge University Press. Edited by Onora O'Neill.
The Sources of Normativity.Christine Korsgaard - 1999 - Philosophical Quarterly 49 (196):384-394.
Kant on duties regarding nonrational nature.Onora O'Neill - 1998 - Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 72 (1):211–228.
Duties to animals: The failure of Kant's moral theory.J. Skidmore - 2001 - Journal of Value Inquiry 35 (4):541-559.

Add more references