Coming to terms with death: The Cruzan case

Abstract

The Supreme Court's decision in Cruzan incorrectly allowed the state of Missouri to intervene in Nancy Cruzan's family's surrogate decision to end life supports. The Court should have held that family members, when they remain close and caring, should be presumed to be the designated decision makers.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,590

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

The moral right to a surrogate decision: the Cruzan case.W. D. Woods - 1989 - Hec Forum: An Interdisciplinary Journal on Hospitals' Ethical and Legal Issues 2 (4):233-8.
Theory and Practice of Pediatric Bioethics.Lainie Friedman Ross - 2015 - Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 58 (3):267-280.
The right to die as a case study in third-order decisionmaking.Frederick Schauer - 1992 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 17 (6):573-587.
In re Edna MF: Case law confusion in surrogate decision making.Robyn S. Shapiro - 1999 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 20 (1):45-54.
Helping Surrogate Decision-Makers Through Difficult Conversations.Nico Nortjé - 2018 - Canadian Journal of Bioethics/Revue canadienne de bioéthique 1 (2):89-90.
No Decision on Cruzan?Varun Gauri - 1990 - Hastings Center Report 20 (2):2-3.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
3 (#1,213,485)

6 months
1 (#1,912,481)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references