Abstract
La question des relations entre expertise scientifique, société et politique est fondamentalement communicationnelle. Souvent présenté comme univoque et incontestable, l’avis des experts ne fait pas taire les controverses. Il est élaboré dans le cadre de relations toujours incertaines, mobilisant les multiples parties prenantes de l’objet de l’expertise dans une situation sociale. Les connaissances qui en résultent constituent, quelque part, des récits qui relèvent de multiples interprétations et recadrages traduisant des logiques d’action hétérogènes, des intérêts économiques et politiques contradictoires, des tensions et des conflits. Ce mouvement s’opère en lien étroit avec les médias et réseaux, au travers desquels les résultats de l’expertise sont diffusés, et de plus en plus souvent discutés.The question of relationships between scientific expertise, society and politics fundamentally revolves around communication. Though often presented as unequivocal and indisputable, expert scientific opinions do not put an end to controversy. They are developed in the context of relationships that are always uncertain, involve many different stakeholders with an interest in the object of the controversy and exist in a social situation. The resulting knowledge shapes narratives that can be interpreted and framed in many different ways, each reflecting different reasons for action, conflicting economic and political interests, tensions or disputes. This process takes place in close conjunction with the activities of the media and networks, through which expert conclusions are broadcast and increasingly debated
Keywords situation d’expertise, médiations, récits d’expertise, institutions, connaissances d’expertise   expert position, mediation, narratives on expertise, institutions, expert knowledge   Article
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
DOI 10.4267/2042/48376
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Translate to english
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 55,909
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

La fabrique de l’expertise scientifique : contribution des STS.Pierre-benoît Joly - 2012 - Hermès: La Revue Cognition, communication, politique 64 (3):, [ p.].
Moral Expertise: Judgment, Practice, and Analysis*: Julia Driver.Julia Driver - 2013 - Social Philosophy and Policy 30 (1-2):280-296.
La prise en compte de l’expertise dans les évaluations conduites par l’AERES.Didier Houssin - 2012 - Hermès: La Revue Cognition, communication, politique 64 (3):, [ p.].
L’Expertise Scientifique À L’Inra : Comprendre les Enjeux de la Demande.Claire Sabbagh - 2012 - Hermès: La Revue Cognition, communication, politique 64 (3):, [ p.].
The Possibility of Ethical Expertise.Bruce D. Weinstein - 1994 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 15 (1):1-187.
What is an Expert?Bruce D. Weinstein - 1993 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 14 (1).
The Core of Expertise.Harry Collins - 2013 - Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 12 (2):399-416.
Adaptation de la Charte Nationale de L’Expertise au CNRS.Laura Maxim, Gérard Arnold & Pascal Dayez-Burgeon - 2012 - Hermès: La Revue Cognition, communication, politique 64 (3):, [ p.].

Analytics

Added to PP index
2014-01-18

Total views
12 ( #749,858 of 2,401,868 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #552,323 of 2,401,868 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes