The Twinkling of an Eye

American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 83 (2):219-238 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this paper I challenge the received view of the relationship between Kierkegaard and Heidegger and explore the relationship between phenomenology and theology. Against the received view—the familiar claim that Heidegger “secularizes” Kierkegaard—I argue that both philosophers attempt to uncover the existential conditions for the possibility of an authentic existence and take the passionate religious life to be one form of such an existence. Therefore, Heidegger’s concept of resoluteness does not represent a secularized break with but rather aphenomenological development of Kierkegaard’s concept of inwardness; and both concepts represent a mode of existence that is the condition for the possibility of genuine Christian faith. This grounding relationship between resoluteness and faith, I argue, is representative of Heidegger’s view of the relationship between phenomenological and theological concepts in general. Thus, my argument not only sheds light onHeidegger’s development of Kierkegaard but it also clarifies some important features of the relationship between phenomenology and theology.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,932

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-01-09

Downloads
19 (#792,484)

6 months
5 (#836,811)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Blurred vision: Marion on the ‘possibility’ of revelation.Matthew I. Burch - 2010 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 67 (3):157-171.
Blurred vision: Marion on the 'possibility' of revelation. [REVIEW]Matthew I. Burch - 2010 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 67 (3):157 - 171.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references