Can the new indispensability argument be saved from Euclidean rescues?

Synthese 187 (2):489-508 (2012)
Abstract
The traditional formulation of the indispensability argument for the existence of mathematical entities (IA) has been criticised due to its reliance on confirmational holism. Recently a formulation of IA that works without appeal to confirmational holism has been defended. This recent formulation is meant to be superior to the traditional formulation in virtue of it not being subject to the kind of criticism that pertains to confirmational holism. I shall argue that a proponent of the version of IA that works without appeal to confirmational holism will struggle to answer a challenge readily answered by proponents of a version of IA that does appeal to confirmational holism. This challenge is to explain why mathematics applied in falsified scientific theories is not considered to be falsified along with the rest of the theory. In cases where mathematics seemingly ought to be falsified it is saved from falsification, by a so called 'Euclidean rescue'. I consider a range of possible answers to this challenge and conclude that each answer fails
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11229-010-9848-6
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 25,071
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
The Scientific Image.C. Van Fraassen Bas - 1980 - Oxford University Press.
Pursuit of Truth.W. V. Quine - 1990 - Harvard University Press.
Two Dogmas of Empiricism.Willard V. O. Quine - 1951 - Philosophical Review 60 (1):20–43.
Mathematics as a Science of Patterns.Michael D. Resnik - 1997 - New York ;Oxford University Press.

View all 26 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
On Frege's Alleged Indispensability Argument.Pieranna Garavaso - 2005 - Philosophia Mathematica 13 (2):160-173.
Isn't the Indispensability Argument Necessarily Analogical?Woosuk Park - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 41:13-18.
Quine's Weak and Strong Indispensability Argument.Lieven Decock - 2002 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 33 (2):231-250.
Indispensability Without Platonism.Anne Newstead & James Franklin - 2012 - In Alexander Bird, Brian Ellis & Howard Sankey (eds.), Properties, Powers and Structures. Routledge.
A Truthmaker Indispensability Argument.Sam Baron - 2013 - Synthese 190 (12):2413-2427.
In Defence of Indispensability.Mark Colyvan - 1998 - Philosophia Mathematica 6 (1):39-62.
Confirmation Theory and Indispensability.Mark Colyvan - 1999 - Philosophical Studies 96 (1):1-19.

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2011-02-13

Total downloads

57 ( #86,909 of 2,132,826 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

24 ( #15,730 of 2,132,826 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums