Can classical description of physical reality be considered complete?

Abstract

We propose a definition of physical objects that aims to clarify some interpretational issues in quantum mechanics. We claim that the transformations generated by the objective properties of a physical system must be strictly interpreted as gauge transformations. We will argue that the uncertainty principle is a consequence of the mutual intertwining between objective properties and gauge-dependant properties. The proposed definition implies that in classical mechanics gauge-dependant properties are wrongly considered objective. We will conclude that, unlike classical mechanics, quantum mechanics provides a complete objective description of physical systems.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,590

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
66 (#85,934)

6 months
4 (#1,635,958)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Process and Reality.Arthur E. Murphy - 1931 - Humana Mente 6 (21):102-106.
How is Quantum Field Theory Possible?Sunny Y. Auyang - 1995 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Process and Reality.Arthur E. Murphy - 1930 - International Journal of Ethics 40 (3):433-435.

View all 12 references / Add more references