From Legal Pluralism to Dual State: Evolution of the Relationship between the Chinese and Hong Kong Legal Orders
The Law and Ethics of Human Rights 16 (1):99-135 (2022)
AbstractThis article provides the first-ever comprehensive analysis of how the relationship between the Chinese and Hong Kong legal orders has morphed in nature since China’s resumption of sovereignty over Hong Kong in 1997. It argues that the relationship has evolved from a form of legal pluralism found in the European Union to a monist but bifurcated system—to a “dual state,” to borrow from Ernst Fraenkel’s theory. Recent events, including Beijing’s imposition of a national security law on Hong Kong and its overhaul of Hong Kong’s election methods, have consolidated that evolution. The analysis herein not only enables us to make sense of the developments in the China-Hong Kong relationship, but has five wider theoretical implications. First, it suggests a way of distinguishing a dual state from a fully liberal legal system. Second, it discerns the similarities and differences between legal pluralism and dual state. Third, it connects the literature on theories of legal order and that on the dual state. Fourth, it clarifies the relationship between theories of legal order and regime types. Finally, Hong Kong’s experience reveals the challenges of and potential mechanisms for maintaining liberal values in an authoritarian regime.
Similar books and articles
State, Society and the Relations Between Them: Implications for the Study of Legal Pluralism.Ido Shahar - 2008 - Theoretical Inquiries in Law 9 (2):417-441.
Legal pluralism.Margaret Davies - 2010 - In Peter Cane & Herbert M. Kritzer (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Empirical Legal Research. Oxford University Press.
Legal Pluralism and International Human Rights Law: Inherently Incompatible, Mutually Reinforcing or Something in Between?Helen Quane - 2013 - Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 33 (4):675-702.
What Can a Bilingual Corpus Tell Us About the Translation and Interpretation of Rape Trials?Ester S. M. Leung - 2015 - International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique 28 (3):469-483.
Existence of Marriage in the Sasak Tribe in Lombok (Merariq) Within the Estuary of Legal Pluralism.Wahyuddin Lukman - 2014 - Jurnal Ius 2 (3).
Existence of Marriage in the Sasak Tribe in Lombok (Merariq) Within the Estuary of Legal Pluralism.Wahyu Lukman - 2014 - Jurnal Ius 2 (3).
Waikeung Tam: Legal Mobilization Under Authoritarianism: Cambridge University Press, 2013.Kwai Hang Ng - 2015 - International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique 28 (3):703-707.
Revisiting judgment translation in Hong Kong.Lianzhen le ChengHe - 2016 - Semiotica 2016 (209):59-75.
Legal Pluralism and Development: Scholars and Practitioners in Dialogue.Brian Z. Tamanaha, Caroline Sage & Michael Woolcock (eds.) - 2012 - Cambridge University Press.
The Jurisprudence and Administration of Legal Interpreting in Hong Kong.Ester S. M. Leung - 2019 - International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique 32 (1):95-116.
On legal order: Some criticism of the received view. [REVIEW]Riccardo Guastini - 2000 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 3 (3):263-272.
Descriptive and normative aspects of the theory of legal pluralism : illustrated by problems of media regulation.Astrid Link - unknown
Legal pluralism and international development agencies : state building or legal reform.Julio Faundez - 2012 - In Brian Z. Tamanaha, Caroline Mary Sage & Michael J. V. Woolcock (eds.), Legal Pluralism and Development: Scholars and Practitioners in Dialogue. Cambridge University Press.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads