From Legal Pluralism to Dual State: Evolution of the Relationship between the Chinese and Hong Kong Legal Orders

The Law and Ethics of Human Rights 16 (1):99-135 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX


This article provides the first-ever comprehensive analysis of how the relationship between the Chinese and Hong Kong legal orders has morphed in nature since China’s resumption of sovereignty over Hong Kong in 1997. It argues that the relationship has evolved from a form of legal pluralism found in the European Union to a monist but bifurcated system—to a “dual state,” to borrow from Ernst Fraenkel’s theory. Recent events, including Beijing’s imposition of a national security law on Hong Kong and its overhaul of Hong Kong’s election methods, have consolidated that evolution. The analysis herein not only enables us to make sense of the developments in the China-Hong Kong relationship, but has five wider theoretical implications. First, it suggests a way of distinguishing a dual state from a fully liberal legal system. Second, it discerns the similarities and differences between legal pluralism and dual state. Third, it connects the literature on theories of legal order and that on the dual state. Fourth, it clarifies the relationship between theories of legal order and regime types. Finally, Hong Kong’s experience reveals the challenges of and potential mechanisms for maintaining liberal values in an authoritarian regime.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,100

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Legal pluralism.Margaret Davies - 2010 - In Peter Cane & Herbert M. Kritzer (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Empirical Legal Research. Oxford University Press.
What Can a Bilingual Corpus Tell Us About the Translation and Interpretation of Rape Trials?Ester S. M. Leung - 2015 - International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique 28 (3):469-483.
Waikeung Tam: Legal Mobilization Under Authoritarianism: Cambridge University Press, 2013.Kwai Hang Ng - 2015 - International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique 28 (3):703-707.
The Jurisprudence and Administration of Legal Interpreting in Hong Kong.Ester S. M. Leung - 2019 - International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique 32 (1):95-116.
On legal order: Some criticism of the received view. [REVIEW]Riccardo Guastini - 2000 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 3 (3):263-272.
Legal pluralism and international development agencies : state building or legal reform.Julio Faundez - 2012 - In Brian Z. Tamanaha, Caroline Mary Sage & Michael J. V. Woolcock (eds.), Legal pluralism and development: scholars and practitioners in dialogue. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Pluralism and Integrity.Pavlos Eleftheriadis - 2010 - Ratio Juris 23 (3):365-389.


Added to PP

28 (#571,386)

6 months
5 (#644,465)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references