Meanings, impressions, and attitudes: A model of the evaluation process

Psychological Review 76 (5):450-460 (1969)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Add categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1037/h0028275

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,127

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Group impressions as dynamic configurations: The tensor product model of group impression formation and change.Yoshihisa Kashima, Jodie Woolcock & Emiko S. Kashima - 2000 - Psychological Review 107 (4):914-942.
A general connectionist model of attitude structure and change: The ACS (Attitudes as Constraint Satisfaction) model.Brian M. Monroe & Stephen J. Read - 2008 - Psychological Review 115 (3):733-759.
Associative and propositional processes in evaluation: An integrative review of implicit and explicit attitude change.Bertram Gawronski & Galen V. Bodenhausen - 2006 - Psychological Bulletin 132 (5):692-731.
Toward a formalized account of attitudes: The Causal Attitude Network (CAN) model.Jonas Dalege, Denny Borsboom, Frenk van Harreveld, Helma van den Berg, Mark Conner & Han L. J. van der Maas - 2016 - Psychological Review 123 (1):2-22.
Risk attitudes in a changing environment: An evolutionary model of the fourfold pattern of risk preferences.Dave E. W. Mallpress, Tim W. Fawcett, Alasdair I. Houston & John M. McNamara - 2015 - Psychological Review 122 (2):364-375.
Toward a More Pragmatic Approach to Morality: A Critical Evaluation of Kohlberg's Model.Dennis L. Krebs & Kathy Denton - 2005 - Psychological Review 112 (3):629-649.
An integrated utility-based model of conflict evaluation and resolution in the Stroop task.Adam Chuderski & Tomasz Smolen - 2016 - Psychological Review 123 (3):255-290.
Gruesome diagonals.Laura Schroeter - 2003 - Philosophers' Imprint 3:1-23.
An evaluation of a computational model of lexical access: Comment on Dell et al. (1997).Wheeler Ruml & Alfonso Caramazza - 2000 - Psychological Review 107 (3):609-634.
Difference-sensibility for rate of discrete impressions.Knight Dunlap - 1912 - Psychological Review 19 (1):32-59.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-06-30

Downloads
17 (#896,762)

6 months
5 (#710,311)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references