Properties of forking in {$ømega$}-free pseudo-algebraically closed fields

Journal of Symbolic Logic 67 (3):957-996 (2002)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 94,070

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
22 (#700,635)

6 months
14 (#252,581)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

On model-theoretic tree properties.Artem Chernikov & Nicholas Ramsey - 2016 - Journal of Mathematical Logic 16 (2):1650009.
Independence over arbitrary sets in NSOP1 theories.Jan Dobrowolski, Byunghan Kim & Nicholas Ramsey - 2022 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 173 (2):103058.
Notions around tree property 1.Byunghan Kim & Hyeung-Joon Kim - 2011 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 162 (9):698-709.
Forking, imaginaries, and other features of.Christian D’elbée - 2021 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 86 (2):669-700.
Pseudo real closed fields, pseudo p-adically closed fields and NTP2.Samaria Montenegro - 2017 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 168 (1):191-232.

View all 13 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Model Theory.Michael Makkai, C. C. Chang & H. J. Keisler - 1991 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 56 (3):1096.
Simple theories.Byunghan Kim & Anand Pillay - 1997 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 88 (2-3):149-164.
Generic structures and simple theories.Z. Chatzidakis & A. Pillay - 1998 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 95 (1-3):71-92.

Add more references