Slippery Slopes, Moral Slides and Human Nature

Informal Logic 17 (1) (1995)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Causal slippery slope arguments with moral conclusions are sometimes stronger than we think. Their strength may be missed either by overlooking the problems of human nature which support the arguments or, upon seeing the problems, by underestimating their influence upon human behaviour. This article aims to correct the oversight and the misjudgement by looking in some detail at four interrelated problems of human nature which have a direct bearing upon moral causal slope arguments

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,642

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Down the slippery slope: arguing in applied ethics.E. Telfer - 1993 - Journal of Medical Ethics 19 (4):240-241.
Slippery Slope Arguments and Social Policy Debates.Eric Lode - 1996 - Dissertation, University of Colorado at Boulder
Suizidhilfe, Selbstbestimmung und Slippery Slopes.Klaus Peter Rippe - 2016 - Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie 102 (3):363-379.
Human gene therapy and slippery slope arguments.T. McGleenan - 1995 - Journal of Medical Ethics 21 (6):350-355.
Slippery slope arguments.Douglas N. Walton - 1992 - New York: Oxford University Press.
What's Wrong with Slippery Slope Arguments?Trudy Govier - 1982 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 12 (2):303 - 316.
Arguing along the slippery slope of human embryo research.Jeanne Salmon Freeman - 1996 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 21 (1):61-81.
The Slippery Slope Argument.Govert den Hartogh - 1998 - In Helga Kuhse & Peter Singer (eds.), A Companion to Bioethics. Malden, Mass., USA: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 321–332.
Precedent Slippery Slopes.Katharina Stevens - 2023 - In Timothy Endicott, Hafsteinn Dan Kristjánsson & Sebastian Lewis (eds.), Philosophical Foundations of Precedent. Oxford University Press.
Slippery Slope Arguments.Anneli Jefferson - 2014 - Philosophy Compass 9 (10):672-680.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-24

Downloads
3 (#1,213,485)

6 months
51 (#302,321)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Why abortion is immoral.Don Marquis - 1989 - Journal of Philosophy 86 (4):183-202.
Abortion and the golden rule.R. M. Hare - 1975 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 4 (3):201-222.
The sorites paradox.James Cargile - 1969 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 20 (3):193-202.
Reasoning with Loose Concepts.Max Black - 1963 - Dialogue 2 (1):1-12.

View all 11 references / Add more references