Rechtstheorie 26 (1):27-44 (1995)

Authors
Paolo Comanducci
Università degli Studi di Genova
Abstract
This paper considers certain aspects of Aarnio’s theory of legal reasoning. Criticism is limited to the notion of legal certainty and to the related notions of the justification and reasonable acceptability of interpretative standpoints.
Keywords Aarnio, Aulis  legal certainty  legal reasoning  interpretation
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 60,992
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Rhetoric and the Rule of Law.Neil MacCormick - 2001 - The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 11:51-67.
On Legal Reasoning.Aulis Aarnio - 1977 - Turun Yliopisto.
Meta-Meta. Comments on the Ontology and Epistemology of Aarnio's Legal Theory.Hannu Tapani Klami - 1979 - In Aleksander Peczenik & Jyrki Uusitalo (eds.), Reasoning on Legal Reasoning. Society of Finnish Lawyers. pp. 167.
Empirical Certainty and the Theory of Important Criteria.Michael Anthony Slote - 1967 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 10 (1-4):21 – 37.
Klein on Relative Certainty.Rod Bertolet - 1987 - Philosophy Research Archives 13:271-274.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2014-03-27

Total views
17 ( #604,079 of 2,439,431 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #433,565 of 2,439,431 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes