Exposing and overcoming the fixed-effect fallacy through crowd science

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 45 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

By organizing crowds of scientists to independently tackle the same research questions, we can collectively overcome the generalizability crisis. Strategies to draw inferences from a heterogeneous set of research approaches include aggregation, for instance, meta-analyzing the effect sizes obtained by different investigators, and parsing, attempting to identify theoretically meaningful moderators that explain the variability in results.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,779

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Variability in the sizes of brain parts.Jon H. Kaas & Christine E. Collins - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (2):288-290.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-04-09

Downloads
27 (#575,991)

6 months
22 (#159,837)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references