Art

Abstract

As soon as there is a human work, one or more non-human dimensions are involved, bearing in mind that, on the other hand, it could be that the pure non-human does not exist, in other words that the non-human itself envelops the human in return. De jure, both movements should be considered from an anthropocosmic perspective. In the context of a contribution on art, however, we will focus on the first perspective, while the second is more of a "technological" approach. We will illustrate this point by focusing on the paintings of Paul Cézanne.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,642

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Can Machines Create Art?Mark Coeckelbergh - 2016 - Philosophy and Technology 30 (3):285-303.
Art or Works of Art.Debora Pazetto Ferreira - 2018 - Proceedings of the XXIII World Congress of Philosophy 1:239-243.
The Art of Philosophy.Neil Cooper - 1991 - Philosophy 66 (256):169 - 175.
Art and Islamic Themes and Content.Mahdi Bahrami - 2018 - Proceedings of the XXIII World Congress of Philosophy 17:7-11.
Anthropocene and Art.Alberto Carrillo & May Zindel - 2018 - Glimpse 19:117-124.
Art, nature, significance.David E. Cooper - 2009 - The Philosophers' Magazine 44 (44):27-35.
Art, nature, significance.David E. Cooper - 2009 - The Philosophers' Magazine 44:27-35.
Art and selection.Brian Boyd - 2009 - Philosophy and Literature 33 (1):pp. 204-220.

Analytics

Added to PP
2024-04-14

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references