Compositional belief update

Abstract

In this paper we explore a class of belief update operators, in which the definition of the operator is compositional with respect to the sentence to be added. The goal is to provide an update operator that is intuitive, in that its definition is based on a recursive decomposition of the update sentence’s structure, and that may be reasonably implemented. In addressing update, we first provide a definition phrased in terms of the models of a knowledge base. While this operator satisfies a core group of the benchmark Katsuno Mendelzon update postulates, not all of the postulates are satisfied. Other Katsuno Mendelzon postulates can be obtained by suitably restricting the syntactic form of the sentence for update, as we show. In restricting the syntactic form of the sentence for update, we also obtain a hierarchy of update operators with Winslett’s standard semantics as the most basic interesting approach captured. We subsequently give an algorithm which captures this approach; in the general case the algorithm is exponential, but with some not unreasonable assumptions we obtain an algorithm that is linear in the size of the knowledge base. Hence the resulting approach has much better complexity characteristics than other operators in some situations. We also explore other compositional belief change operators: erasure is developed as a dual operator to update; we show that a forget operator is definable in terms of update; and we give a definition of the compositional revision operator. We obtain that compositional revision, under the most natural definition, yields the Satoh revision operator.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,774

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Belief Revision and Update.Alvaro del Val - 1993 - Dissertation, Stanford University
Dynamic logic for belief revision.Johan van Benthem - 2007 - Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics 17 (2):129-155.
Deriving properties of belief update from theories of action.Alvaro Val & Yoav Shoham - 1994 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 3 (2):81-119.
Deriving properties of belief update from theories of action.Alvaro Vadell & Yoav Shoham - 1994 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 3 (2).
Constructive Modelings for Theory Change.Pavlos Peppas & Mary-Anne Williams - 1995 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 36 (1):120-133.
Restricting and Embedding Imperatives.Nate Charlow - 2010 - In Maria Aloni, H. Bastiaanse, T. De Jager & Katrin Schulz (eds.), Logic, Language, and Meaning: Selected Papers from the 17th Amsterdam Colloquium. Springer.
Geodesic merging.Konstantinos Georgatos - 2018 - Synthese 195 (10):4243-4264.
Belief Update Using Graphs.Konstantinos Georgatos - 2008 - In David Wilson & Chad H. Lane (eds.), FLAIRS 21. AAAI Press. pp. 649-654.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-30

Downloads
35 (#121,482)

6 months
6 (#1,472,471)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

An Investigation of the Laws of Thought.George Boole - 1854 - [New York]: Dover Publications.
Theory contraction through base contraction.André Fuhrmann - 1991 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 20 (2):175 - 203.
Severe withdrawal (and recovery).Hans Rott & Maurice Pagnucco - 1999 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 28 (5):501-547.

View all 14 references / Add more references