Commentary on Eugenie Scott and Glenn branch's "guest viewpoint: 'Intelligent design' not accepted by most scientists," 7/2/02 [Book Review]
The National School Boards Association enlisted Eugenie Scott and Glenn Branch to criticize intelligent design bullet point fashion. Here I want to respond to these bullet-point assertions. I would repeat the entire article, but copyright restrictions prevent me. The article is available at http://nsba.org/sbn/02-jul/070202-8.htm.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Why Scientists and Philosophers of Science Should Teach Intelligent Design Alongside the Theory of Evolution.Aaron Sloman - unknown
Intelligent Design From the Viewpoint of Complex Systems Theory.Dong Chunyu - 2010 - Frontiers of Philosophy in China 5 (3):461-470.
In Defence of Intelligent Design.William Dembski - 2006 - In Philip Clayton (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Religion and Science. Oxford University Press. pp. 715-731.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads15 ( #314,494 of 2,170,064 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #345,514 of 2,170,064 )
How can I increase my downloads?