A sixth kind of legitimate fieldwork in social anthropology: cross-disciplinary

Abstract

I present the concept of cross-disciplinary legitimacy: the fieldwork which an anthropologist has done is considered legitimate fieldwork in another discipline as well. Also, I present a puzzle regarding how the anthropologist untrained in another discipline can do such fieldwork and a response.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

The challenges of cross-disciplinary research.Jens Aagaard-Hansen - 2007 - Social Epistemology 21 (4):425 – 438.
Key Debates in Anthropology.Tim Ingold (ed.) - 1996 - Routledge.
On the nature of cross-disciplinary integration: A philosophical framework.Michael O'Rourke, Stephen Crowley & Chad Gonnerman - 2016 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 56 (C):62-70.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-12-02

Downloads
100 (#173,725)

6 months
44 (#93,571)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Terence Rajivan Edward
University of Manchester (PhD)

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references