Holistic modeling: an objection to Weisberg’s weighted feature-matching account

Synthese 194 (5):1743–1764 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Michael Weisberg’s account of scientific models concentrates on the ways in which models are similar to their targets. He intends not merely to explain what similarity consists in, but also to capture similarity judgments made by scientists. In order to scrutinize whether his account fulfills this goal, I outline one common way in which scientists judge whether a model is similar enough to its target, namely maximum likelihood estimation method. Then I consider whether Weisberg’s account could capture the judgments involved in this practice. I argue that his account fails for three reasons. First, his account is simply too abstract to capture what is going on in MLE. Second, it implies an atomistic conception of similarity, while MLE operates in a holistic manner. Third, Weisberg’s atomistic conception of similarity can be traced back to a problematic set-theoretic approach to the structure of models. Finally, I tentatively suggest how these problems might be solved by a holistic approach in which models and targets are compared in a non-set-theoretic fashion

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-01-22

Downloads
100 (#178,157)

6 months
36 (#102,360)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Wesley Fang
Shanxi University

References found in this work

Ontological relativity and other essays.Willard Van Orman Quine (ed.) - 1969 - New York: Columbia University Press.
The Structure of scientific theories.Frederick Suppe (ed.) - 1974 - Urbana,: University of Illinois Press.
Introduction to logic.Patrick Suppes - 1957 - Mineola, N.Y.: Dover Publications.

View all 42 references / Add more references