- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
On Conservativeness and Incompleteness
Journal of Philosophy 82 (5):239-260 (1985)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)My notes
Similar books and articles
Science without Numbers by Hartry H. Field. [REVIEW]David Malament - 1982 - Journal of Philosophy 79 (9):523-534.
Deflating the conservativeness argument.Hartry Field - 1999 - Journal of Philosophy 96 (10):533-540.
Is Fourier Analysis Conservative over Physical Theory?Nicholas Danne - forthcoming - Logique Et Analyse.
Hartry H. Field, Science Without Numbers. [REVIEW]Bernard Linsky - 1982 - Philosophy in Review 2:161-164.
Analytics
Added to PP
2017-02-22
Downloads
5 (#1,559,732)
6 months
5 (#838,466)
2017-02-22
Downloads
5 (#1,559,732)
6 months
5 (#838,466)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Safety first: making property talk safe for nominalists.Jack Himelright - 2022 - Synthese 200 (3):1-26.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-6686886f5-kkm7k uwo