Risky Tradeoffs in The Expanse

In Jeffery L. Nicholas (ed.), The Expanse and Philosophy. Wiley. pp. 179–185 (2021-10-12)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The Expanse does not provide an easy answer to the vexing question on making a decision when competing, but considering conflicts of values on the show can help us reason about tough choices in real life. Sometimes, scientific progress conflicts with the prudential value of self‐preservation. This chapter explains three ways of understanding value conflicts: as situations in which every option is forbidden, situations in which every option is permissible, or situations in which some options are obligatory and some options are forbidden. The idea that all these different kinds of value can be traded with a common currency is tempting. But contra Keats, beauty is not truth; and it certainly is not goodness, as Tolstoy says. Epistemic, moral, prudential, and aesthetic values are very different.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,069

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-06-15

Downloads
11 (#1,166,624)

6 months
6 (#587,779)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Stefano Lo Re
University of St. Andrews
Claire Field
University of Stirling

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references