Effects of differential instructions, differential feedback, and ucs intensity on the conditioned-eyelid response
Journal of Experimental Psychology 75 (1):56 (1967)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)DOI
10.1037/h0024896
My notes
Similar books and articles
Effects of differential instructions, differential payoffs, and the presence or absence of feedback on the percentage, latency, and amplitude of the conditioned eyelid response.Harold D. Fishbein & I. Gormezano - 1966 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 71 (4):535.
Effects of differential instructions and number of acquisition trials on extinction and reacquisition of the conditioned-eyelid response.Harold D. Fishbein - 1967 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 75 (1):126.
Differential eyelid conditioning as a function of the frequency and intensity of auditory CSs.John W. Moore - 1964 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 68 (3):250.
Effects of "anxiety-lessening" instructions and differential set development on the extinction of GSR.William W. Grings & Russell A. Lockhart - 1963 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 66 (3):292.
Intensity of the conditioned stimulus and strength of conditioning: I. The conditioned eyelid response to light.David A. Grant & Dorothy E. Schneider - 1948 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 38 (6):690.
Differential classical eyelid conditioning as a function of CS intensity, CS rise time, and interstimulus interval.Susan M. Wilcox & Leonard E. Ross - 1969 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 82 (2):272.
Effects of instructions on the transfer of a conditioned response.Richard H. Lindley - 1959 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 57 (1):6.
CS intensity and CS-UCS interval effects in human eyelid conditioning.Harold D. Fishbein, Paul D. Jones & Colin Silverthorne - 1969 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 81 (1):109.
Effects of false feedback and stimulus intensity on simple reaction time.Kerm Henriksen - 1971 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 90 (2):287.
Response topography in the acquisition of differential eyelid conditioning.Michael J. Zajano & David A. Grant - 1974 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 103 (6):1115.
A comparison of verbal, manual, and conditioned-response methods in the determination of auditory intensity thresholds.C. C. Neet - 1936 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 19 (4):401.
Supplementary report: Effects of instructions on extinction and recovery of a conditioned avoidance response.K. E. Moyer & Richard H. Lindley - 1962 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 64 (1):95.
Transfer of differential eyelid conditioning: Effects of semantic and formal features of verbal stimuli.Michael J. Zajano, David A. Grant & Marian Schwartz - 1974 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 103 (6):1147.
Analytics
Added to PP
2013-11-22
Downloads
5 (#1,168,640)
6 months
1 (#447,139)
2013-11-22
Downloads
5 (#1,168,640)
6 months
1 (#447,139)
Historical graph of downloads