Political cognition helps explain social class divides: Two dimensions of candidate impressions, group stereotypes, and meritocracy beliefs

Cognition 188 (C):108-115 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Group beliefs.Raimo Tuomela - 1992 - Synthese 91 (3):285-318.
What happened to the "social" in social psychology?John D. Greenwood - 2004 - Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 34 (1):19–34.
Amyraut on Reason and Religious Belief.Kristen Irwin - 2011 - Modern Schoolman 88 (3-4):191-200.
What’s wrong with the evolutionary argument against naturalism?Geoff Childers - 2011 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 69 (3):193-204.
Stereotype: End Of Story.Gordana Đerić - 2005 - Filozofija I Društvo 2005 (28):71-93.
Is Distributed Cognition Group level Cognition?Kirk Ludwig - 2015 - Journal of Social Ontology 1 (2):189-224.
From Democratic Meritocracy to Meritocratic Democracy: Why Political Meritocracy Matters.Elena Ziliotti - 2017 - Philosophy and Public Issues - Filosofia E Questioni Pubbliche 7 (1).
Why Accept Collective Beliefs?Anthonie Meijers - 2003 - ProtoSociology 18:377-388.
Stereotype: End of (a) story.Gordana Djeric - 2005 - Filozofija I Društvo 2005 (28):71-93.
Shifting values partly explain the debate over group selection.Ayelet Shavit - 2003 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 35 (4):697-720.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-11-27

Downloads
26 (#595,031)

6 months
3 (#992,474)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations