Was Persius not a 'micher'?

The Classical Review 42 (05):167-168 (1928)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,745

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Was Persius a ‘Micher’?J. Tate - 1928 - The Classical Review 42 (2):63-64.
Persius No 'Micher.'.J. Tate - 1929 - The Classical Review 43 (02):56-59.
Persius. [REVIEW]J. R. Jenkinson - 1987 - The Classical Review 37 (1):26-27.
Persius.S. H. Braund - 1989 - The Classical Review 39 (01):29-.
Notes on Persius.Morris H. Morgan - 1889 - The Classical Review 3 (1-2):10-11.
A Conversation In Persius.N. E. Collinge - 1967 - The Classical Review 17 (2):132-132.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-12-06

Downloads
21 (#173,985)

6 months
2 (#1,816,284)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references