LIS as applied philosophy of information: a reappraisal. Invited contribution to the special issue of Library Trends dedicated to the Philosophy of Information

Library Trends 52 (3):658–665 (2004)
  Copy   BIBTEX


Library information science (LIS) should develop its foundation in terms of a philosophy of information (PI). This seems a rather harmless suggestion. In Floridi (2002a), I have articulated some of the reasons why I believe that PI can fulfill the foundationalist needs better than SE can. In this contribution, I clarify some aspects of my proposal (Floridi, 2002a) in favor of the interpretation of LIS as applied PI. The aim of the article is to remove some ambiguities and possible misunderstandings that might prevent the correct evaluation of my position, so that disagreement can become more constructive.



External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The philosophy of information: ten years later.Luciano Floridi - 2010 - Metaphilosophy 41 (3):402–419.
Trends in the philosophy of information.Luciano Floridi - 2008 - In Pieter Adriaans & Johan van Bentham (eds.), Philosophy of Information. Amsterdam, Netherlands: pp. 113–131.
Information Studies Without Information.Jonathan Furner - 2004 - Library Trends 52 (3):427-446.
Introduction to The Philosophy of Information.Ken Herold - 2004 - Library Trends 52 (3):373-376.


Added to PP

33 (#355,936)

6 months
10 (#88,159)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Luciano Floridi
Oxford University

Citations of this work

The Self and the Ontic Trust: Toward Technologies of Care and Meaning.Tim Gorichanaz - forthcoming - Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society 17 (3).

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references