Of Mice and Men: Adorno on Art and the Suffering of Animals

Estetika: The European Journal of Aesthetics 48 (2):139-156 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Theodor W. Adorno’s criticism of human beings’ domination of nature is a familiar topic to Adorno scholars. Its connection to the central relationship between art and nature in his aesthetics has, however, been less analysed. In the following paper, I claim that Adorno’s discussion of art’s truth content (Wahrheitsgehalt) is to be understood as art’s ability to give voice to nature (both human and non-human) since it has been subjugated by the growth of civilization. I focus on repressed non-human nature and examine Adorno’s interpretation of Eduard Mörike’s poem ‘Mausfallen-Sprüchlein’ (Mousetrap rhyme). By giving voice to the repressed animal, Mörike’s poem manages to point towards the possibility of a changed relationship between mice and men, between nature and humanity, which is necessary in order to achieve reconciliation amongst humans as well

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,296

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-11-19

Downloads
5 (#1,562,871)

6 months
68 (#77,156)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Camilla Flodin
Uppsala University

Citations of this work

Adorno and Schelling on the art–nature relation.Camilla Flodin - 2018 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 26 (1):176-196.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references