How expendable are »Kollektivsingulare« actually?

Deutsche Vierteljahrsschrift für Literaturwissenschaft Und Geistesgeschichte 97 (1):65-71 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In the historical, literary, and philosophical history of concepts, large-scale concepts or, more precisely, »Kollektivsingulare« [collective singular concepts] – as Koselleck described them with considerable effect on the practice of social history – are regarded as metaphysical, ideological, or at least as simplifications. The essay does not deny that this is justified, but with a certain melancholy it pleads for a careful archiving and also for the ongoing use of the terms in question including their multifaceted historical semantology. This even applies to the term »Geist.« To reject this concept cannot really mean replacing it or – more drastically – erasing it altogether.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,846

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Deleuze on literature.Ronald Bogue - 2003 - New York: Routledge.
Deleuze on Literature.Ronald Bogue - 2003 - New York: Routledge.
The Logic of Literature. [REVIEW]F. B. C. - 1974 - Review of Metaphysics 28 (1):123-124.
Companion to literary theory.David H. Richter (ed.) - 2018 - Hoboken: Wiley.
Outcomes of General Education. [REVIEW]Joseph A. Walsh - 1944 - Thought: Fordham University Quarterly 19 (3):509-510.
Philosophy and German Literature, 1700–1990.Nicholas Saul (ed.) - 2002 - Cambridge University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-02-28

Downloads
4 (#1,623,074)

6 months
1 (#1,469,946)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references