A note on definability in equational logic

History and Philosophy of Logic 15 (2):189-199 (1994)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

After an introduction which demonstrates the failure of the equational analogue of Beth?s definability theorem, the first two sections of this paper are devoted to an elementary exposition of a proof that a functional constant is equationally definable in an equational theory iff every model of the set of those consequences of the theory that do not contain the functional constant is uniquely extendible to a model of the theory itself.Sections three, four and five are devoted to applications and extensions of this result.Topics considered here include equational definability in first order logic, an extended notion of definability in equational logic and the synonymy of equational theories.The final two sections briefly review some of the history of equational logic

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,642

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-10

Downloads
9 (#449,242)

6 months
21 (#723,368)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Universal Algebra.George Grätzer - 1982 - Studia Logica 41 (4):430-431.
Some applications of infinitely long formulas.H. Jerome Keisler - 1965 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 30 (3):339-349.
Mathematical Logic.Donald Monk - 1975 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 40 (2):234-236.
A method in proofs of undefinability.Karel Louis de Bouvère - 1959 - Amsterdam,: North-Holland Pub. Co..
Horn sentences.Fred Galvin - 1970 - Annals of Mathematical Logic 1 (4):389.

View all 6 references / Add more references