Philosophy of Science 70 (1):27-48 (2003)

Peter Gildenhuys
Lafayette College
In what follows, I critique the interpretation that Sober and Wilson offer of their group selection model in Unto Others. Sober and Wilson mistakenly claim that their model operates as an example of Simpson's paradox and defend an interpretation of their model according to which groups are operated upon by natural selection. In the place of their interpretation, I offer one that parallels the mathematical calculation of the model's outcome and does not depend on the postulation of a force of group selection or a value for group fitness.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1086/367867
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 64,209
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Gender Issues in Corporate Leadership.Devora Shapiro & Marilea Bramer - 2013 - Handbook of the Philosophical Foundations of Business Ethics:1177-1189.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total views
104 ( #105,013 of 2,455,351 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #303,290 of 2,455,351 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes