Why reciprocal altruism is not a kind of group selection

Biology and Philosophy 26 (3):385-400 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Reciprocal altruism was originally formulated in terms of individual selection and most theorists continue to view it in this way. However, this interpretation of reciprocal altruism has been challenged by Sober and Wilson (1998). They argue that reciprocal altruism (as well as all other forms of altruism) evolves by the process of group selection. In this paper, we argue that the original interpretation of reciprocal altruism is the correct one. We accomplish this by arguing that if fitness attaches to (at minimum) entire life cycles, then the kind of fitness exchanges needed to form the group-level in such situations is not available. Reciprocal altruism is thus a result of individual selection and when it evolves, it does so because it is individually advantageous

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 76,442

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Evolution of Reciprocal Altruism.Robert L. Trivers - 1971 - Quarterly Review of Biology 46 (1):35-57.
Altruism, group selection and correlated interaction.Samir Okasha - 2005 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 56 (4):703-725.
Multilevel selection and human altruism.Alejandro Rosas - 2008 - Biology and Philosophy 23 (2):205-215.
Modelling reciprocal altruism.Christopher Stephens - 1996 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 47 (4):533-551.
Evolutionary ethics and biologically supportable morality.Michael Byron - 1999 - Proceedings of Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy, PAIDEIA: Philosophy Educating Humanity.
Why won't the group selection controversy go away?Samir Okasha - 2001 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 52 (1):25-50.
The evolution of altruism: The sober/wilson model.Peter Gildenhuys - 2003 - Philosophy of Science 70 (1):27-48.
Morality and Evolution by Group Selection.Michael Byron - 1999 - Http://Www.Bu.Edu/Wcp/Papers/TEth/TEthByro.Htm.
Evolution, altruism, and the prisoner's dilemma.Ishtiyaque Haji - 1992 - Biology and Philosophy 7 (2):161-175.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-03-23

Downloads
97 (#129,356)

6 months
2 (#301,800)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

Units and levels of selection.Elisabeth Lloyd - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Can altruism be unified?Grant Ramsey - 2016 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 56:32-38.

Add more citations