Galileo and Platonistic Methodology

Journal of the History of Ideas 31 (4):501 (1970)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper is a critical examination the claim that Galileo was a Platonist. It contends that neither his use of mathematics (as Koyre asserts), nor his hypothetic-deductive method of testing (as Cassirer maintains), nor a realistic interpretation of this abstract theories (as Crombie argues) offers reasonable and consistent evidence that Galileo shared or advocated the metaphysics or methods of Plato.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 94,045

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Die wissenschaftstheorie galileis — oder: Contra Feyerabend. [REVIEW]Klaus Fischer - 1992 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 23 (1):165 - 197.
Die Wissenschaftstheorie Galileis — oder: Contra FeyerabendGalileo's philosophy of science — or: Contra feyerabend.Klaus Fischer - 1992 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 23 (1):165-197.
Galileo and Plato.Alexandre Koyre - 1943 - Journal of the History of Ideas 4 (4):400.
Experiences and the Bible in Galileo’s Letter to Castelli.Matjaž Vesel - 2015 - Teorie Vědy / Theory of Science 37 (2):123-158.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-07

Downloads
10 (#1,207,918)

6 months
6 (#700,858)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

T. R. Girill
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references