Revising the Common Rule: Ethics, Scientific Advancement, and Public Policy in Conflict
Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 45 (3):452-459 (2017)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)My notes
Similar books and articles
Scientific Research and the Public Trust.David B. Resnik - 2011 - Science and Engineering Ethics 17 (3):399-409.
Questions about Environmental Ethics? Toward a Research Agenda with a Focus on Public Policy.Charles Y. Deknatel - 1980 - Environmental Ethics 2 (4):353-362.
Can Bayes' Rule be Justified by Cognitive Rationality Principles?Bernard Walliser & Denis Zwirn - 2002 - Theory and Decision 53 (2):95-135.
Questions about environmental ethics? Toward a research agenda with a focus on public policy.Charles Y. Deknatel - 1980 - Environmental Ethics 2 (4):353-362.
Scientific Consensus and Public Policy.Darrin W. Belousek - 2004 - Journal of Philosophy, Science and Law 4:1-35.
Public Misunderstanding of Science? Reframing the Problem of Vaccine Hesitancy.Maya J. Goldenberg - 2016 - Perspectives on Science 24 (5):552-581.
The common morality in communitarian thought: Reflective consensus in public policy.Mark G. Kuczewski - 2009 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 30 (1):45-54.
A Kuhnian Crisis in Neo-Darwinism.Mark Frederick Earthey - 1987 - Dissertation, Aston University (United Kingdom)
When the Philosopher Enters the Room. Comments on Jonathan Wolff's PHILOSOPHY AND PUBLIC POLICY.Annabelle Lever - unknown
The Real Conflict Between Science and Religion: Alvin Plantinga’s Ignoratio Elenchi.Herman Philipse - 2013 - European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 5 (2):87--110.
Beyond serving a purpose: additional ethical focuses for public policy agents.Vanessa Scholes - 2011 - In Jonathan Boston, Andrew Bradstock & David Eng (eds.), Ethics and public policy: contemporary issues. Victoria University Press.
Public healthcare resource allocation and the Rule of Rescue.R. Cookson, C. McCabe & A. Tsuchiya - 2008 - Journal of Medical Ethics 34 (7):540-544.
Of Cell Phones and Electronic Mail: Disclosure of Confidential Information Under Disciplinary Rule 4-101 and Model Rule 1.6. [REVIEW]Karin Mika - 1999 - Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics and Public Policy 13 (1):121-130.
Scientific Controversies. A Socio-Historical Perspective on the Advancement of Science.Dominique Raynaud - 2015 - Transaction Publishers.
Avoiding empty rhetoric: Engaging publics in debates about nanotechnologies.Renee Kyle & Susan Dodds - 2009 - Science and Engineering Ethics 15 (1):81-96.
Analytics
Added to PP
2017-10-25
Downloads
9 (#937,492)
6 months
1 (#450,993)
2017-10-25
Downloads
9 (#937,492)
6 months
1 (#450,993)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Implementing Regulatory Broad Consent Under the Revised Common Rule: Clarifying Key Points and the Need for Evidence.Holly Fernandez Lynch, Leslie E. Wolf & Mark Barnes - 2019 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 47 (2):213-231.
References found in this work
Is Deidentification Sufficient to Protect Health Privacy in Research?Mark A. Rothstein - 2010 - American Journal of Bioethics 10 (9):3-11.
Regulating Research with Biospecimens under the Revised Common Rule.Holly Fernandez Lynch & Michelle N. Meyer - 2017 - Hastings Center Report 47 (3):3-4.
Modernizing Research Regulations Is Not Enough: It's Time to Think Outside the Regulatory Box.Suzanne M. Rivera, Kyle B. Brothers, R. Jean Cadigan, Heather L. Harrell, Mark A. Rothstein, Richard R. Sharp & Aaron J. Goldenberg - 2017 - American Journal of Bioethics 17 (7):1-3.
