Reply to mr fine's note

British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 15 (58):141 (1964)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1093/bjps/xv.58.141-a

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,069

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Review: R. L. Goodstein, Constructive Formalism. Essays on the Foundations of Mathematics; R. L. Goodstein, The Foundations of Mathematics. [REVIEW]John Myhill - 1953 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 18 (3):258-260.
David Miller. A paradox of information. The British journal for the philosophy of science, vol. 17 no. 1 , pp. 59–61. - Karl R. Popper. A comment on Miller's new paradox of information. The British journal for the philosophy of science, vol. 17 no. 1 , pp. 61–69. - Karl R. Popper. A paradox of zero information. The British journal for the philosophy of science, vol. 17 no. 2, pp. 141–143. - J. L. Mackie. Miller's so-called paradox of information.The British journal for the philosophy of science, vol. 17 no. 2, pp. 144–147. - David Miller. On a so-called so-called paradox: a reply to Professor J. L. Mackie.The British journal for the philosophy of science, vol. 17 no. 2, pp. 147–149. - Jeffrey Bub and Michael Radner. Miller's paradox of information.The British journal for the philosophy of science, vol. 19 no. 1 , pp. 63–67. - David Miller. The straight and narrow rule of induction: a reply to Dr Bub and Mr Radner.The British journal for the philosophy of science, vol. 19 no. 2, pp. 145. [REVIEW]Richard C. Jeffrey - 1970 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 35 (1):124-127.
Reply to Mr Spilsbury1.Henry Ezriel - 1957 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 7 (28):342-347.
GOODSTEIN, R. L. - Mathematical Logic. [REVIEW]G. B. Keene - 1958 - Mind 67:422.
Reply to mr Kumar.S. Körner - 1967 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 18 (4):323-324.
Reply to mr Spilsbury.Henry Ezriel - 1956 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 7 (28):342-347.
Third reply to mr Goldstein.J. W. N. Watkins - 1959 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 10 (39):242-244.
Development of Mathematical Logic by R. L. Goodstein. [REVIEW]Stephan Körner - 1972 - Isis 63:594-594.
Goodstein R. L.. On the restricted ordinal theorem.Hugo Ribeiro - 1945 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 10 (3):104-105.
Yehoshua Bar-Hillel. Comments on ‘Degree of confirmation’ by Professor K. R. Popper. The British Journal for the philosophy of science, vol. 6 , pp. 155–157. - Karl R. Popper. ‘Content’ and ‘degree of confirmation’: A reply to Dr Bar-Hillel. The British Journal for the philosophy of science, vol. 6 , pp. 157–163. - Rudolf Carnap. Remarks on Popper's note on content and degree of confirmation. The British Journal for the philosophy of science, vol. 7 , pp. 243–244. - K. R. Popper. Reply to Professor Carnap. The British Journal for the philosophy of science, vol. 7 , pp. 244–245. - Y. Bar-Hillel. Further comments on probability and confirmation. A rejoinder to Professor Popper. The British Journal for the philosophy of science, vol. 7 , pp. 245–248. - K.R.Popper. Adequacy and consistency: A second reply to Dr Bar-Hillel. The British Journal for the philosophy of science, vol. 7 , pp. 249–256. - Peter Achinstein. The identity hypothesis. The British Journal for the philosophy of science,. [REVIEW]Harry V. Stopes-Roe - 1968 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 33 (1):142-146.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
142 (#135,046)

6 months
9 (#355,594)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references