Reply to mr Spilsbury

British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 7 (28):342-347 (1956)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

1957

DOI

10.1093/bjps/vii.28.342

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,932

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Reply to Mr Spilsbury1.Henry Ezriel - 1957 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 7 (28):342-347.
Reply to mr Kumar.S. Körner - 1967 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 18 (4):323-324.
Third reply to mr Goldstein.J. W. N. Watkins - 1959 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 10 (39):242-244.
Reply to mr fine's note.R. L. Goodstein - 1964 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 15 (58):141.
Some aspects of probability and induction: A reply to mr. Bennett.William Kneale - 1957 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 8 (29):57-63.
The straight and narrow rule of induction: A reply to dr Bub and mr Radner.David Miller - 1968 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 19 (2):145-152.
Origin and Concept of Relativity (Parts I and II): Reply to Professor Dingle and Mr Levinson.G. H. Keswani - 1966 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 17 (2):149-152.
Reply to Mr Henry.Alvin Plantinga - 1975 - Philosophical Books 16 (3):8-10.
Science as representation: A reply to mr. Mackinnon.Rom Harré - 1977 - Philosophy of Science 44 (1):146-158.
Reply to mr. McKinney.E. C. Kemble - 1953 - Philosophy of Science 20 (3):232-235.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
52 (#298,620)

6 months
2 (#1,446,987)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references