Richard Doll and Alice Stewart: Reputation and the Shaping of Scientific "Truth"

Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 54 (4):504-531 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

As the world watched the Fukushima reactors spew incalculable quantities of radionuclides into the sea and air and wondered what effect this would have on our health and that of generations to come, the warnings of Dr. Alice Stewart about low-dose radiation risk assumed a terrible timeliness. As industry, governments, and the media attempted to quiet the alarms, assuring us that radioactive releases will dilute and disperse and become too miniscule to matter, the reassurances of Sir Richard Doll, foremost among Stewart's detractors, also became relevant. It is clear, as proponents and opponents of nuclear energy thrash it out, that there is not much more scientific consensus about the hazards of low-dose radiation ..

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 94,678

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Mice and the Reactor: The "Genetics Experiment" in 1950s Britain.Soraya de Chadarevian - 2006 - Journal of the History of Biology 39 (4):707 - 735.
Mortgaging the future: Dumping ethics with nuclear waste.Kristin Shrader-Frechette - 2005 - Science and Engineering Ethics 11 (4):518-520.
We Should Stop Running Away from Radiation.Wade Allison - 2011 - Philosophy and Technology 24 (2):193-195.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-10-19

Downloads
54 (#293,014)

6 months
6 (#737,493)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references