A Constructivist Curriculum?

Constructivist Foundations 13 (3):323-324 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Open peer commentary on the article “Heterarchical Reflexive Conversational Teaching and Learning as a Vehicle for Ethical Engineering Curriculum Design” by Philip Baron. Upshot: To work with institutional curricula, it is necessary to adopt practices that conflict with a radical constructivist philosophy. This conflict can generate contradictions that are often left uninspected, and which are particularly hard to disentangle in a post-colonial society.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,853

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

How to Promote Constructivist Teaching.Hugh Gash - 2018 - Constructivist Foundations 13 (3):320-321.
Radical Constructivism and the Decolonisation of Epistemology.Ben Sweeting - 2018 - Constructivist Foundations 13 (3):326-327.
Changing the Educational System: The Bigger Picture.Laurence D. Richards - 2018 - Constructivist Foundations 13 (3):331-333.
Why I Am a Constructivist Atheist.J. P. Van Bendegem - 2015 - Constructivist Foundations 11 (1):138-140.
When Is a Constructivist not a Constructivist?T. McCloughlin - 2016 - Constructivist Foundations 12 (1):79-80.
Representing Knowledge in a Computational Constructivist Agent.T. Degris - 2013 - Constructivist Foundations 9 (1):63-64.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-08-12

Downloads
3 (#1,711,881)

6 months
1 (#1,471,470)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references